Wednesday 29 September 2010

Blurred vision on the 3D bandwagon

Blurred vision on the 3D bandwagon: "

With Star Wars and Inception returning in stereoscopic vision – and three-dimensional HBO due to launch – is 2D dead?

The intriguing thing about 3D is that even after the enormous success of Avatar nobody knows yet how extensive its use will become in modern film. Might 2D eventually become the exclusive preserve of low budget or independent film-making, with virtually all mainstream fare pushed into stereoscopic vision? Or, once all the fuss and hype dies down, will we see 3D only where its use is sensible: in features with the kind of content that lends itself to the experience?

Up until recently, most observers have seen the second outcome as the more likely one. But there appears to be a rabid frenzy going on in Hollywood right now, with every project under the sun seemingly being green-lit in 3D. Today, the US trades confirmed the rumours that George Lucas is to bring his entire six-film Star Wars saga back to the big screen in stereoscopic vision, starting with 1999's The Phantom Menace (because blooming Jar Jar Binks' fizzog will naturally be infinitely less irritating in three dimensions than it was in two) in 2012. And, in a separate report, I read that Warner Bros is considering retro-fitting Christopher Nolan's Inception for a 3D re-release in cinemas and on the small screen, via US network HBO's soon-to-be-launched 3D TV channel.

Yes, that's right, 3D TVs are very much here. You can buy one now, though you may have to remortgage your house to do so. Naturally, however, as more people grab one the prices will come down. And before long you won't have to wear glasses in order to see that extra dimension: new technologies are already in place which use a different system to trick the eyes into picking up extra depth.

Whether we actually want all this extra gimmickry is a moot point, but it has to be a concern if Hollywoodinhidef.com's report is correct and a film-maker such as Nolan, who specifically chose not to make Inception a 3D project, is now being pushed into doing so retrospectively. Even worse, the article suggests that the film-maker's forthcoming sequel to the Dark Knight, the third in his excellent Batman series, will be shot in three dimensions – whether Nolan likes it or not.

Imagine that. In a few years' time, you sit down for an eight-hour Batman marathon, watching all three films back to back (I'm sad enough to have done this with Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings, so I'm confident that this is a genuine potential scenario) and when it comes to the final movie everything suddenly goes all 3D. Or will Warner insist that the first two films are also refitted? What a bunch of jokers.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

"

News: Be Guybrush in Force Unleashed 2

News:
Be Guybrush in Force Unleashed 2
: "




Monkey Island joins Star Wars.

Star Wars: The Force Unleashed II will let you play as Monkey Island hero Guybrush Threepwood.

Well, you'll be able to wear a Guybrush Threepwood skin, but it's a convincing and stylish one nonetheless.

'Yes, this is real,' confirmed the game's Facebook page. 'We just could not resist!'


Read more...

"

Tuesday 28 September 2010

News: EA releasing DOSBoxed Wing Commander

News:
EA releasing DOSBoxed Wing Commander
: "




All thanks to BioWare Mythic's Barnett.
An EA-sanctioned DOSBoxed (PC emulated) version of Wing Commander is near to release.

BioWare Mythic's abundantly enthusiastic creative director Paul Barnett's on the case. He wanted to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the game with a re-release and so bullied EA legal into helping him realise his goal.

'Now having the Wing Commander game data compared to our original source code, we need a clean bill of health at this stage,' read Barnett's most recent Tweet.


Read more...

"

Why tequila is a girl's best friend

Why tequila is a girl's best friend: "

The discovery that he could make diamonds from Mexico's favourite tipple changed this physicist's life

Ever since our research was first published, people who hear about it for the first time just can't help laughing. Well, the fact is that most sane people would not dream of trying to turn cheap tequila into diamonds. In fact, at most of the scientific conferences I have attended, the first response to the reading of any paper on the topic is laughter, and a lot of it. But then the audience quietens down. There is no doubt that this research makes people laugh … and then think.

I had never heard of the Ig Nobel prizes until I was called and informed that I, together with the two other authors of the research, had been nominated. At the beginning of the conversation, I thought it was just an ingenious prank, but after hanging up, I checked the internet.

On the Ig Nobel prize site, I read the phrase 'Research that first makes people laugh, and then makes them think' and realised that the call was probably legit … sort of. As it turned out, the prize has given me an even greater opportunity to deliver a message to students. I usually tell them: 'Whoever thinks that science is a dry subject (pardon the pun) is wrong: science can be fun.' I go on to explain how Mexico's favourite alcoholic drink can be subjected to different pressures and heat treatments making it turn from liquid to gas, and finally to a solid, in the form of diamond micro-crystals.

I began experimenting about 14 years ago with synthetic diamonds (made by a technological process, as opposed to natural diamonds, produced by a geological process) from hydrocarbon gases such as methane as prime material. Hydrocarbon gases are formed basically by carbon and hydrogen atoms. Then, three years ago, we produced diamonds from liquid organic compounds like acetone, methanol and ethanol. Working with ethanol, I noticed that the ideal compound is about 40% ethanol and 60% water, and this composition is very similar to the proportion used in most tequilas.

So, one day I went to an off-licence off the campus and bought a bottle of cheap tequila. I used it under the same experimental conditions as for a test with ethanol and water, and obtained positive results.

Turning tequila into diamonds may sound funny, and inspire jokes about alchemists in modern labs, but the discovery could yield interesting results. The team is currently focused on improving the quality of the diamonds. Tequila contains about 150 different substances, most of which are formed during fermentation and distillation. These substances give the drink its typical flavour, aroma and taste.

As a result, the diamonds are almost unavoidably contaminated. To carry our investigation to a happy end, the deposited tequila diamonds must be free of any chemical contaminant that could obstruct its performance during specific applications. At the same time, one must not dismiss the possibility that some contaminant might just help to improve the diamond's performance for some application. But applications will only suggest themselves when the process yields a high-quality diamond film.

We can, however, anticipate that the first applications might appear in the electronic industry, where our tequila diamonds could be used as semiconductors, in, for example, the fabrication of high-power semiconductor devices, computer chips and optical devices.

If I hadn't bought that cheap tequila bottle to probe its performance as prime material in the production of synthetic diamonds, we probably would not know that tequila naturally has the perfect mix of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen atoms to form diamonds.

Some members of the scientific community in Mexico and elsewhere believe that the kind of recognition afforded by the Ig Nobel prizes should not be bestowed on serious scientists, but my belief is that any important discovery or scientific achievement, whether it's funny or not, deserves recognition. The nine genuine Nobel laureates who presented the prize to us – such as Martin Chalfie, winner of the 2008 Nobel prize for chemistry, who doubled as the prize in the "Win a Date With a Nobel Laureate" contest – seemed to think so, too.

I've been asked many times whether I am going to be able to make enough diamonds to turn myself into a billionaire. Unfortunately, the answer is no, because the diamonds are so small – on average, a millionth of a millimetre – that they can be observed only by using an electronic microscope. That's not very practical for engagement rings, necklaces or tiaras.

But I have no doubt that, for years to come, these tequila-based diamonds will still be generating laughs, since, after all, tequila diamonds are forever, too.

• Dr Miguel Apátiga is a physicist at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México's Thin Film Laboratory for Applied Physics and Advanced Technology, in Juriquilla, Querétaro, México

This year's Ig Nobel prizes will take place at Harvard University on Thursday. The ceremony will be broadcast live at 12.30am GMT on Friday at http://www.youtube.com/improbableresearch


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

"

Selling Incandescent Light Bulbs As Heating Device

Selling Incandescent Light Bulbs As Heating Device: "Csiko writes 'The European union has banned by law trading of incandescent light bulbs due to their bad efficiency/ecology reasons (most of the energy is transformed into heat). A company is now trying to bypass this by offering their incandescent light bulb products as a heating device (article in German) instead of a light device. Still, their 'heat balls' give light as well as heating. So - every law can be bypassed if you have some creativity!'



Read more of this story at Slashdot.

"

RIM unveils The BlackPad BlackBerry PlayBook

RIM unveils The BlackPad BlackBerry PlayBook: "

Hey, Steve. It runs Flash


BlackBerry Devcon Update: This story has been updated with additional information from RIM's DevCon keynote.

"

Monday 27 September 2010

Christian group declares jct 9 on M25 cursed

Christian group declares jct 9 on M25 cursed: "

Vigil cleanses area of unholy cassette recordings


A group of Christian evangelicals has declared junction 9 of the M25 'hexed' and is staging regular prayer meetings to cleanse the benighted interchange.…

"

Facebook is not worth $33,000,000,000

Facebook is not worth $33,000,000,000: "

Facebook is an amazing success as a social network. Anyone who can get 500 million people to connect, share photos, and click on little cows in Farmville deserves major kudos.




But the bullshit monopoly-money valuation merry-go-round has to stop. It’s getting beyond ridiculous and when even serious publications like Forbes jump on for a ride. It’s time to take deep breath and take a look at reality.




Minority investment valuations aren’t real

Facebook is now supposedly worth $33,000,000,000, but that number is entirely based on what star-struck minority investors have paid for a tiny slice of the company.




The company has supposedly taken just under a billion dollars in venture capital and small secondary-market sales of stock. So the actual money that has changed hands is just 3% of the total valuation of the company!




In other words, the valuation is resting on the flawed assumption that Facebook could actually ever get 33 times as much money to change hands if they wanted to. There’s just no way, no how that’s happening right now. If it could, they’d IPO tomorrow.




So the Facebook valuation based on minority investments is in my mind a complete joke in the sense that there was $33,000,000,000 dollars on the table. Irrational investor exuberance indeed.




You’re only worth something if you can make money to keep

If you boil it down to what valuations really should be about, discounted future cash flow, it gets completely bizarro-world funny. The rumor is that Facebook will be generating a billion dollars in revenue. That’s certainly real money, right?




Wrong. Real money is what’s left over after you pay your expenses. If the supposed billion dollars Facebook is allegedly pulling in this year was happening at anywhere a decent margin, they wouldn’t have needed a series E round of $120 million from Elevation Partners just three months ago.




But let’s be charitable. Let’s imagine that Facebook miraculously made $200 million this year — a 20% margin. (I don’t think that’s true, otherwise why take another $120 million from Elevation Partners, but hey, let your imagination roam). That would put Facebook’s P/E at some 165.




That’s about 7.5 times as much as Google, the golden cash cow of the internet world. Would you seriously think that Facebook is 7.5 times as good or as promising a business as Google? Get outta here.




No outrageous profits after seven years and half a billion users

Oh, well, but maybe Facebook just needs to mature, you say. If we give them just a few more years, the profit fairy might drop by and sprinkle her billions all over Facebook and its shareholders. I call fat chance.




Facebook has been around for seven years. It has 500 million users. If you can’t figure out how to make money off half a billion people in seven years, I’m going to go out on a limb and say you’re unlikely to ever do.




Now this was all fun and games until somebody promised the Newark schools $100 million in stock based on the fantasy valuation of his under-profiting company. But now it’s real. They’re selling the skin before they shot the bear or peeing their pants to get to the hut or whatever you want to call it. It’s just not good, alright?




Related: 37SIGNALS VALUATION TOPS $100 BILLION AFTER BOLD VC INVESTMENT
Related: Don’t believe BusinessWeek’s bubble-math



"

UK Anti-Piracy Firm E-mails Reveal Cavalier Attitude Toward Legal Threats

UK Anti-Piracy Firm E-mails Reveal Cavalier Attitude Toward Legal Threats: "Khyber writes 'A recent DDoS attack against a UK-based anti-pirating firm, ACS:Law, has resulted in a large backup archive of the server contents being made available for download, [and this archive] is now being hosted by the Pirate Bay. Within this archive are e-mails from Andrew Crossley basically admitting that he is running a scam job, sending out thousands of frivolous legal threats on the premise that a percentage pay up immediately to avoid legal hassles.'



Read more of this story at Slashdot.

"

Monday 20 September 2010

Twitter and a scary tale of modern Britain

Twitter and a scary tale of modern Britain: "

Paul Chambers has felt the full force of state persecution, simply for sending a tweet

The head of MI5 has warned we must take the threat of new Islamist atrocities seriously. If the abuse of antiterrorist legislation in the Paul Chambers case is a guide, the people who most need reminding of the importance of seriousness, are MI5's colleagues in the criminal justice system.

The 27-year-old worked for a car parts company in Yorkshire. He and a woman from Northern Ireland started to follow each other on Twitter. He liked her tweets and she liked his and boy met girl in a London pub. They got on as well in person as they did in cyberspace. To the delight of their followers, Paul announced he would be flying from Robin Hood airport in Doncaster to Northern Ireland to meet her for a date.

In January, he saw a newsflash that snow had closed the airport. 'Crap! Robin Hood Airport is closed,' he tweeted to his friends. 'You've got a week… otherwise I'm blowing the airport sky high!'

People joke like this all the time. When they say in a bar: 'I'll strangle my boyfriend if he hasn't done the washing up' or post on Facebook: 'I'll murder my boss if he makes me work late', it does not mean that the bodies of boyfriends and bosses will soon be filling morgues.

You know the difference between making a joke and announcing a murder, I'm sure. Apparently the forces of law and order do not.

A plain-clothes detective from South Yorkshire Police arrived at Chambers's work. Instead of quietly pointing out that it was best not to joke about blowing up airports, he arrested him under antiterrorist legislation. A posse of four more antiterrorist officers was waiting in reception.

'Do you have any weapons in your car?' they asked.

'I said I had some golf clubs in the boot,' Chambers told me. 'But they didn't think it was funny. I kept wondering, 'When are they going to slap my wrists and let me go?' Instead, they hauled me into a police car while my colleagues watched.'

The Crown Prosecution Service wanted to charge him under the law's provisions against bomb hoaxers, a serious measure aimed at a serious public nuisance. But there had been no hoax. Paul Chambers had not caused a panic at the airport or intended to cause a panic. No one in authority knew about the tweet until some busybody decided to report Chambers.

Instead of displaying a little common sense and letting the matter rest, the CPS dug up an obscure section of the 2003 Communications Act, which makes it an offence to send a 'menacing message' over a public telecommunications network.

Chambers pleaded not guilty after reading an outraged article on his case by David Allen Green, one of the new generation of free-speech lawyers. No good did his plea do him. In a Kafkaesque development, the CPS persuaded judge Jonathan Bennett that in the context of terrorist violence his tweet should be taken as a genuine threat, whether he was joking or not and whether the airport knew about the 'threat' or not.

The judge gave Chambers a criminal record and ordered him to pay £1,000 in costs and fines.

In Milan Kundera's great anti-communist novel The Joke, the young hero tries to impress a beautiful woman with adolescent bravado. Forgetting what happens to dissenters in Soviet-occupied Czechoslovakia, he writes on a card to her: 'Optimism is the opium of the people. A healthy atmosphere stinks of stupidity! Long live Trotsky!' It's a silly joke. But Communist party officials cannot admit it is a joke once the card is discovered or they will be branded as Trotskyite traitors too. So they make him to do forced labour in the mines.

The danger of calling the justice system Kafkaesque or comparing democratic Britain to Stalinist Czechoslovakia is that you risk repeating the exaggerations of hysterical writers. This is a free country, after all, and the state does not send the likes of Paul Chambers to the salt mines.

In this case, the totalitarian comparison is only mildly hyperbolic, however. After his managers at the car parts business heard the police call him a 'terrorist', they fired him. He moved to Northern Ireland to be close to his girlfriend and found a job working for a council.

Last week, he told his employers that his appeal would be heard this Friday and his name would be in the papers. They heard the words 'bomb' and 'airport' and fired him too. Because of a joke, he has a criminal record and lost two jobs. The CPS is ruining his life – for no reason.

With a bit of luck, the crown court will turn his case into a legal scandal. The CPS's claim that a person's intent does not matter when they tweet a joke strikes me as false in law. More pertinently, anyone who reads the reports of the original trial can guess that the police eventually dismissed the affair as a nonsense. If so, was the defence told?

Beyond the law lies the politics. The hounding of Paul Chambers stinks of Labour authoritarianism. The prosecuting authorities showed no respect for free speech. They could not take a joke. They carried on prosecuting Chambers even when they knew he was harmless. They turned a trifle into a crime because a conviction helped them hit performance targets. Inside their bureaucratic hierarchies, it was dangerous to speak out against a superior's stupidity. Better to let an injustice take place than risk a black mark against your name.

If the court condemns the CPS, I can guarantee that Keir Starmer, the director of public prosecutions, will not fire or discipline the prosecutors involved. I doubt if he will even tell them they have undermined support for the anti-terrorist cause.

I don't care what the polls say or how unpopular the coalition becomes – Labour must change the settled view of the majority of Britons that it is the party of politically correct jobsworths or it will never win another election.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




"

Steve Jobs: not what you'd call helpful to a trainee journalist

Steve Jobs: not what you'd call helpful to a trainee journalist: "

The text of emails seen by the Guardian show the chief executive of Apple in profoundly unhelpful mood when a college student got no help from its PR department

Lots of journalists know the experience of contacting Apple to ask about a story and getting no response. But now a journalism student has discovered the experience too. Chelsea Isaacs, who is doing a journalism degree at Long Island University, was asked by her professor to write an article about the implementation of an iPad program at the campus.

So, obviously, being a wannabe journalist, since the story was about Apple, she contacted its press office. Not once, but six times, getting increasingly wound up. And then finally, in the way of a journalist right on deadline, she dug out an email address that is all over the web which is believed to belong to Steve Jobs, chief executive of Apple. Perhaps he could help?

We've seen the headers on the emails from Jobs, and they match IP addresses that could only come from within Apple. We sent the emails - with headers - to Apple on Friday afternoon (morning, their time) and asked for an urgent response by Sunday evening.

And guess what they said? Oh, we'll tell you at the end. First, the emails. We take up the story at 3.22pm (EDT) on Thursday 16 September with Isaacs's first email to Jobs.

Subject: Re: Mr. Jobs - Student Journalist Concerned about Apple's MediaRelations Dept.

Dear Mr. Jobs,'

As a college student, I can honestly say that Apple has treated me very well; my iPod is basically the lifeline that gets me through the day, and thanks to Apple's Final Cut Pro, I aced last semester's video editing project. I was planning to buy a new Apple computer to add to my list of Apple favorites. Because I have had such good experiences as a college student using Apple products, I was incredibly surprised to find Apple's Media Relations Department to be absolutely unresponsive to my questions, which (as I had repeatedly told them in voicemail after voicemail) are vital to my academic grade as a student journalist.

For my journalism course, I am writing an article about the implementation of an iPad program at my school, the CW Post Campus of Long Island University.

The completion of this article is crucial to my grade in the class, and it may potentially get published in our university's newspaper. I had 3 quick questions regarding iPads, and wanted to obtain answers from the most credible source: Apple's Media Relations Department. I have called countless times throughout the week, leaving short, but detailed, messages which included my contact information and the date of my deadline. Today, I left my 6th message, which stressed the increasingly more urgent nature of the situation. It is now the end of the business day, and I have not received a call back. My deadline is tomorrow.

Mr. Jobs, I humbly ask why Apple is so wonderfully attentive to the needs of students, whether it be with the latest, greatest invention or the company's helpful customer service line, and yet, ironically, the Media Relations Department fails to answer any of my questions which are, as I have repeatedly told them, essential to my academic performance.

For colleges nationwide, Apple is at the forefront of improving the way we function in the academic environment, increasing the efficiency of conducting academic research, as well as sharing and communicating with our college communities. With such an emphasis on advancing our education system, why, then, has Apple's Media Relations team ignored my needs as a student journalist who is just trying to get a good grade?

In addition to the hypocrisy of ignoring student needs when they represent a company that does so much for our schools, the Media Relations reps are apparently, also failing to responsibly handle the inquiries of professional journalists on deadlines. Unfortunately, for a journalist in the professional world, lacking the answers they need on deadline day won't just cost them a grade; it could cost them their job.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Chelsea Kate Isaacs, Senior, CW Post - Long Island University

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

The answer pings back at 16:19 (57 minutes later):

From: Steve Jobs [address and header confirmed - CA]

To: Chelsea Isaacs

Subject: Re: Mr. Jobs - Student Journalist Concerned about Apple's Media Relations Dept.

Our goals do not include helping you get a good grade. Sorry.

Sent from my iPhone

Gathering herself, Chelsea emails back at 4.37 (she's taken 18 minutes over this):

Thank you for your reply. I never said that your goal should be to 'help me get a good grade.' Rather, I politely asked why your media relations team does not respond to emails, which consequently, decreases my chances of getting a good grade. But, forget about my individual situation; what about common courtesy, in general --- if you get a message from a client or customer, as an employee, isn't it your job to return the call? That's what I always thought. But I guess that's not one of your goals. Yes, you do have a creative approach, indeed.

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

Is she slightly annoyed? Yes, I think that might be the case.

Back comes the response at 17.10 (33 minutes, if you're counting)

From: Steve Jobs

To: Chelsea Isaacs

Subject: Re: Mr. Jobs - Student Journalist Concerned about Apple's Media Relations Dept.

Nope. We have over 300 million users and we can't respond to their requests unless they involve a problem of some kind. Sorry.

Sent from my iPhone

And at 5.32 (22 minutes later) Chelsea has her answer:

You're absolutely right, and I do meet your criteria for being a customer who deserves a response:

1. I AM one of your 300 million users.

2. I DO have a problem; I need answers that only Apple Media Relations can answer.

Now, can they kindly respond to my request (my polite and friendly voice can be heard in the first 5 or 10 messages in their inbox). Please, I am on deadline.

I appreciate your help.

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

Long pause. Perhaps he's contacting the PR people, having realised that Isaacs only has three questions, that they're about iPads, and that the media relations people might be able to sort it out.

Ya think?

At 18.27, just under an hour since Isaacs's last email, comes the final reply:

From: Steve Jobs

To: Chelsea Isaacs

Subject: Re: Mr. Jobs - Student Journalist Concerned about Apple's MediaRelations Dept.

Please leave us alone.

Sent from my iPhone

We have had no response from Apple on whether the emails are legit. We're quite confident that they come from within Apple (they come from the 17.x.x.x IP range, which is assigned to Apple)- but there seem to be three possibilities for who's writing them:
1) Steve Jobs. This is the most likely answer, though there has been an instance where Apple's PR people have - shockingly - roused themselves to say that one such conversation is a fake, though in that case the person having hte conversation had been hawking it around for money. Isaacs hasn't asked for money, and has answered our questions.

2) Someone inside Apple who has been given the job of answering as though they're Steve Jobs to random emails from outside. If that's the case, they're not covering themselves in glory.

3) Someone inside Apple who has been assigned this email address, and is responding as best they can, but can't really handle it.

Whichever it is, Apple would probably do well to stop that person sending responses to people outside Apple. Honestly, it doesn't look good.

And it might also make sense for Apple's PR department to recruit a couple more people.

Chelsea Isaacs, meanwhile, joins the vast ranks of journalists who've put media queries into Apple and never heard back. Unfortunately, it's not what you'd call an exclusive club. And as far as we know, she didn't get the answers about the iPad either.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




"

Intel + DRM: a crippled processor that you have to pay extra to unlock

Intel + DRM: a crippled processor that you have to pay extra to unlock: "

Intel's latest business-model takes a page out of Hollywood's playbook: they're selling processors that have had some of their capabilities crippled (some of the cache and the hyperthreading support are switched off). For $50, they'll sell you a code that will unlock these capabilities. Conceptually, this is similar to the DRM notion that I can sell you a movie that you can watch on one screen for $5 today, and if you want to unlock your receiver's wireless output so you can watch it upstairs, it'll be another $5.


I remember the first time someone from the studios put this position to me. It was a rep from the MPAA at a DRM standards meeting, and that was just the example he used. He said: 'When you buy a movie to watch in your living room, we're only selling you the right to see it in your living room. Sending the same show upstairs to watch in your bedroom has value, and if it has value, we should be able to charge money for it.'


This idea, which Siva Vaidhyanathan calls 'If value, then right,' sounds reasonable on its face. But it's a principle that flies in the face of the entire human history of innovation. By this reasoning, the company that makes big tins of juice should be able to charge you extra for the right to use the empty cans to store lugnuts; the company that makes your living room TV should be able to charge more when you retire it to the cottage; the company that makes your coat-hanger should be able to charge more when you unbend it to fish something out from under the dryer.


Moreover, it's an idea that is fundamentally anti-private-property. Under the 'If value, then right' theory, you don't own anything you buy. You are a mere licensor, entitled to extract only the value that your vendor has deigned to provide you with. The matchbook is to light birthday candles, not to fix a wobbly table. The toilet roll is to hold the paper, not to use in a craft project. 'If value, then right,' is a business model that relies on all the innovation taking place in large corporate labs, with none of it happening at the lab in your kitchen, or in your skull. It's a business model that says only companies can have the absolute right of property, and the rest of us are mere tenants.


If there's one industry where 'If value, then right,' is a dead letter, it's computing. The first processors Intel ever sold went into PCs did practically nothing. It was only the addition of unlicensed, unauthorized, independent third-party innovation -- software, peripherals, networks -- that made them valuable enough to send more business Intel's way.


Intel is a direct beneficiary of our property rights in our computers: the company's best customers are hobbyists who buy Intel processors directly in order to upgrade their PCs. What if Dell asserted 'If value, then right,' and told its customers that they had only purchased the right to run their PCs as-is, an if they wanted a faster processor, they'd have to pay Dell to unlock this latent value?


One thing remains to be seen: will Intel try to sue people who figure out how to unlock their processors without paying Intel? Under the more exotic interpretations of the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, showing your neighbor how to unlock her Intel processor is a copyright violation (though a recent court decision went the other way).


Just this week, Intel's spokesman sang the praises of the DMCA's anti-circumvention rules and promised to use them to club down its competitors. Let's hope that this anti-property mania doesn't extend to attempts at shutting down websites that distribute software that let us unlock our own processors.


Intel wants to charge $50 to unlock stuff your CPU can already do

(via /.)


(Image: Engadget/Brian)





"

Android Apps on the Samsung Galaxy Tab look just fine

Android Apps on the Samsung Galaxy Tab look just fine: "

Just as Google was stating that their Android 2.2 OS was not built for devices with a larger than 4-5 inch screen, analyst Rob Enderle of Enderle Group has said that Android Market apps simply will not look pleasing on the device because they were built for smaller screens. However, how well does an opinion stack up with actual knowledge of the device? Android community had gotten their hands-on the device at the Samsung Tab Event last Thursday, and real world tests in this case do not stack up with the “expert opinion.”



Android Community app on Galaxy Tab


“Apps aren’t going to scale right and won’t be quite as pretty” on the Galaxy Tab, Enderle said in an interview. “The apps are probably going to be a little ugly.”


In fact, it seems that Rob Enderle wasn’t even at the event nor even had any hands-on with the Tab. This is very crucial when making claims because what you think and what you can actually see are two different things. It turns out the the Tabs resolution will not be a problem for apps on the device. Google still may go with their plans and block market access, but the apps themselves will look and function just fine. Android Community at the hands-on event got to see the device, on top of the screen looking amazing, there seemed to be no present scaling issues at all.


We even downloaded our own app at the event and it looked great, no visual issues, distortion, or blurriness. You can check out a video of the Android Community App on the Galaxy Tab below.




It is clear the Apps can run on the Tab with little to no problem visually. As always in the world of development, nothing can beat an actual hands-on with a device.


[Via ComputerWorld]


)"

Friday 17 September 2010

Secret messages written into fabric of our world

Secret messages written into fabric of our world: "

A girl playing noughts and crosses, a Playboy centrefold, Sky satellite dishes, the trill of a modem – all have hidden meanings

Frank Swain blogs at http://scienceblogs.com/sciencepunk/

Even if you don't watch much TV, you've probably come across Carole Hersee. Her TV career has spanned over forty years, clocking up around 70,000 hours of on-screen time with her faithful co-star Bubbles. She's appeared on a host of BBC channels, typically in the early hours, but has yet to land a speaking role. If you hadn't guessed already, I am of course referring to the eternally youthful subject of the BBC test cards, who has graced our screens since 1967.

I like the BBC test card, because it's a wonderful example of how practical industrial design can develop into an enigmatic work of art. But even better is knowing that the image isn't just art, it has an objective purpose worked into it, a secret meaning that reveals itself under scrutiny. The architecture of industrial design is filled with these subtle codes, and together they create a world around us filled with hidden meaning.

If we look at the BBC test cards, the colours and patterns framing Carole have a fairly obvious purpose, providing reference points for colour and contrast. The white triangles aligned with the cardinal points are there to check if the edges of the image line up with those of the screen.

In test card J, the X on the noughts and crosses board marks the exact centre of the screen. Even Carole was chosen for a reason – her skin tone makes it easy to spot if something is wrong with the colours displayed, while Bubbles is there to add some green, so that all three primary colours appear in the image. (Bubbles has since embarked on a solo career, popping up in the BBC website error pages).

Carole isn't the only woman to have been immortalised in a test card in this way. A modest crop of the November 1972 Playboy centrefold Lena Soderberg became the standard test for image compression software.

A couple of months ago I flew over to HP's DIMO facility in Dublin, the sprawling high-tech campus where the electronics giant develops new ink technology. We toured the stadium-sized production room, where conveyor belts loop and twist though a dozen giant machines that assemble cartridges and squirt brightly coloured fluids into them.

At the end of the tour we passed through a small room sectioned off by heavy plastic drapes, where the cartridges are tested on a variety of printers. Piled among the benches were sheets of arcane patterns – the printer test pages. I aksed our guide Thom Brown to decipher the meaning behind them.

Here's a typical example. The T shapes mark out page alignment, while the solid blocks of colour are actually made up of individual lines painted sequentially by each nozzle – hence a misfiring nozzle leaves a long trace across the block. Most printers will produce a grid pattern of some sort so that an engineer can identify the exact nozzle that is at fault.

'Each line in the grid represents a nozzle. Notice that a missing line means that one nozzle is completely not firing (clogged most likely),' says Brown. 'But then some lines are faint or partial: an unhealthy nozzle that's partially clogged or ink isn't for some reason completely filling the chamber. And then some lines are crooked or misdirected, so that drop isn't firing exactly straight like we want it.'

Hidden patterns exist everywhere. If you get disoriented in the streets of London, look for a Sky satellite dish – they always point south-east. Need to synchronise your watch? Wait for the pips to be broadcast on Radio 4 – synchronised with an atomic clock in the basement of Broadcasting House, they begin precisely five seconds before the hour with the start of the final, longest pip marking the exact moment the hour changes.

Grab a newspaper – see those blocks of colour down the edge of the page? Those are printer test patterns too, a quick reference to check if there's been an error during press. And what about the barcode on the back? Those extra-long double lines at each end and down the middle are 'guard bars', which are there to help the scanner align itself properly. It's a subtle detail that's often missed by tattoo artists, leading to punks walking around with the binary equivalent of nonsense Chinese characters on their neck.

I still get nostalgic when I hear a dial-up modem break into song, and I'm thrilled at how, despite the exact meaning behind each tone being way beyond my comprehension, my ear can still detect regional variations in the handshake signal, like some kind of robotic accent.

Like the best tailors, the men and women who craft our technological environment often strive to hide the seams of their work. But if you know where to look, you can occasionally peel back the fabric of your surroundings and spot a trace of what's holding it all together.

Frank Swain is a science writer working in print, TV and radio who blogs at http://scienceblogs.com/sciencepunk/


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

"

BT feathers ruffled over pigeon-based file transfer caper

BT feathers ruffled over pigeon-based file transfer caper: "

SURFIN' BIRD!


BT is peeved at an experiment appearing to demonstrate that a carrier pigeon is faster and more efficient than its broadband service. The experiment, supervised by BBC Lincolnshire and carried out by weary internet user Michelle Brumfield, proved embarrassing to the telcom in much the same way as last year's South African soaraway shenanigans.…

"

#657; The Negotiator

#657; The Negotiator: "

has anyone ever done a roshambo/rashomon crossover? 'I WON'  'NO, *I* WON'



"

[Comic] The Difference Between Android And iPhone – This Pretty Much Sums It Up

[Comic] The Difference Between Android And iPhone – This Pretty Much Sums It Up: "

Found at the top of reddit’s Android page today is this comic comparing the openness of Android to the closed ecosystem of Apple’s iPhone and iOS. It warranted an immediate tweet, but since tweets are very short-lived, I decided to have it take a more permanent place on our site.


Here we go:


image


No editorial comments from me – I decided to reserve that role for you, our readers, in the space below.



"

Facebook Places checks in to UK

Facebook Places checks in to UK: "

Facebook Places, the location-sharing service launched in the US last month is now available in the UK

Facebook Places, the location-sharing service launched in the US last month, is now available in the UK.

Some UK users of the Facebook iPhone application found they could check-in using the then-unreleased Places earlier this month, but the Cupertino-based company denied it had been testing services this side of the Atlantic.

The UK becomes the fourth territory where Facebook Places is available to users, after it launched in Japan earlier this week after the initial announcement in the US.

A European launch is imminent, but such a move in Germany would add to growing concerns over technology and the infringement of privacy in the country. Data protection authorities in Hamburg are locked in talks with Google over its Street View mapping service, the California-based company looking to upload images of 20 cities in the country by the end of this year.

Michael Sharon, product manager for Facebook Places, said there were three goals behind its new location-sharing service: to make
it easier to share where you are, discover new places and discover new friends.

On the privacy settings in place, Sharon said: 'We wanted to prepare a robust set of privacy controls. I'm really proud of what we've done with the Places privacy settings because they are unprecedented in the industry at this moment in time.'

'We think Here Now is a fantastic feature. It's a great way to meet new interesting people, but we also know some people wouldn't like to use the feature, they just want to share with friends or friends of friends – so we took care to turn it on for only some people.

'Some people explicitly let us know that they just want to share with a certain group so we changed the settings from the default for them – of course they can opt-back in at a later time.'

Sharon added a wider European rollout would be imminent, saying: 'We want users to have best experience possible in every country that we are in, so we hope to bring it to wider Europe in the near future.

'People are [sharing their location on Facebook] already, people are already saying on Facebook, 'I'm here' – this formalises it, it let's them have a structured way of sharing. This is really the beginning in terms of how we start to weave location into out everyday lives.'

'We think the tagging feature is one of the most powerful and interesting. For minors [aged 13-17], we made sure to restrict visibility of tags just to friends [and friends of friends] only, no matter what the minor chooses to do. If you're a minor and go to privacy control and set it to everyone, even though it will say everyone it won't show for anyone but your friends.'

Although the service is operated on an opt-out basis unlike most of the features on Facebook Places, Google has said it will not publish images of properties where a member of the public has made such a request as it looks to placate a particularly hostile reaction in the country.

Tony Dyhouse, cyber security director of the UK Digital Systems Knowledge Transfer Network, said: 'Location based services have done a lot to improve our lives but people need to treat applications like Facebook Places with care. It's important to realise what criminals can glean from where you are not, i.e. at home.

'The criminal fraternity can quite easily build up a profile that includes your address, if they then have confirmation you are not at home, it can be dangerous. My main concern here is that the default setting for the location application will be 'on' – people need to be aware of the potential privacy risks associated with this.'

Earlier this week media reports linked a spree of burglaries in the US to Facebook Places, claiming the suspects had seen that homeowners were out and trying their luck. However, journalism professor and Guardian columnist Jeff Jarvis quickly pointed out:

'One or two of the suspects were Facebook friends with the respective homeowners. They basically had access to the walls and could read that the families were away on vacation. The information was only available to friends and the Facebook Places feature was NOT a part of this.'

A survey of 1,184 British Foursquare users commissioned by MyVoucherCodes.co.uk showed that most (82% in this case) would ditch the check-in service once Facebook places launches in the UK. The juggernaut-like momentum of Facebook could be cause for concern for lesser-known location-sharing services like Foursquare and Gowalla, with 74% of respondents saying they'd be happier using Places as more of their friends were likely to also be using it.

Facebook's larger user base – it has more than half-a-billion active users worldwide – will also attract the attention of advertisers looking to connect the virtual and physical worlds. In the UK, Domino's Pizza has a Foursquare campaign offering incentives to users who regularly attend its physical stores.

But Facebook, still a privately-held company valued at more than $33bn, is in no hurry to risk sacrificing adoption for commercialisation. Its primary aim is to tap into the increasingly lucrative social gaming industry, betting that swathes of 'late adopters' will follow the dedicated group sharing their location on a daily basis.

'I think that crossing the chasm from the early adopter segment of oversharers, over to the more reticent mainstream, is not something that will happen right away,' says Ray Valdes, a senior analyst at research firm Gartner. 'The mainstream will absorb geotagging habits only by osmosis over time.'

According to a recent study by communications regulator Ofcom, 45% of web browsing time on UK mobiles is spent on Facebook.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds




"

Thursday 16 September 2010

Race Pits Pigeons Against Poor UK Rural Broadband

Race Pits Pigeons Against Poor UK Rural Broadband: "Mark.JUK writes 'Rural internet access in the United Kingdom, like many other countries around the world, is slow. So slow in fact that Trefor Davies, the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) at business ISP Timico, has decided to pit a typical rural broadband connection against homing pigeons (with attached memory cards) to see which can get 200MB of HD video data across an 84 mile trip the fastest. Meanwhile a farmer will attempt to upload the same video file to YouTube before the pigeons can complete their journey. The comical stunt is designed to raise awareness of the often woeful broadband speed experienced by many people who live in remote and rural parts of their country. However Davies does admit that 'there isn't a benchmark for pigeon data speeds', yet.'



Read more of this story at Slashdot.

"

13,000 satellites around the Earth

13,000 satellites around the Earth: "



Here's a visualization of the 13,000 satellites in orbit around the Earth. Intellectually, I know that these still represent an infinitesimal drop in the overall volume of their orbits, but it sure looks crowded when you see it like this. The Google Earth blog also has a realtime feed of their current positions.


Positions of Satellites Around Earth

(via @glinner)





"

Wednesday 15 September 2010

Stephen King's The Dark Tower gets the green light from on high

Stephen King's The Dark Tower gets the green light from on high: "

Universal has opted to bring King's seven-novel epic to celluloid. But should Ron Howard direct?

Recent years have contrived to restrict the number of projects which fall into the category 'cannot be done'. It's not so long ago that JRR Tolkien's Lord of the Rings was 'unfilmable', and the idea of a trilogy of super-dark, adult-oriented Batman films would have been scuppered by the need to sell plenty of Batmerchandise and ensure spots for Seal and U2 on the soundtrack.

However, it seems that, despite the supposed industry backlash against fanboy projects, we are living in more open-minded times. Gone are the days when rogue producers with little in the way of creative nous seemed to be able to inflict their every whim on the battered cinemagoing public. In 2010, to an extent, the film-maker is king – at least if his name is Christopher Nolan.

Ron Howard may not be a director to get the hip kids hot under the collar but he has critical (well, Academy) acclaim nailed and is capable of keeping the money-men onside – even if that does mean shooting bland big-screen adaptations of Dan Brown novels in between his more imaginative projects. But is he the right man to film The Dark Tower, Stephen King's sprawling seven-novel fantasy series about gunslinger Roland Deschain and his multi-dimensional struggle to find the structure that holds the key to saving his world? Despite, that is, being one of the few people in Hollywood with the clout to actually get the thing made.

According to Deadline, King is planning a three-film version of the saga with at least another two seasons of a TV show to connect the dots. Such a multi-platform project would be the first of its kind and potentially even greater in scope than Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy, itself a gargantuan eight-year endeavour.

'What Peter did was a feat, cinematic history,' Howard told Deadline. 'The approach we're taking also stands on its own, but it's driven by the material. I love both, and like what's going on in TV. With this story, if you dedicated to one medium or another, there's the horrible risk of cheating material. The scope and scale call for a big-screen budget. But if you committed only to films, you'd deny the audience the intimacy and nuance of some of these characters and a lot of cool twists and turns that make for jaw-dropping, compelling television.

'We've put some real time and deep thought into this, and a lot of conversations and analysis from a business standpoint, to get people to believe in this and take this leap with us. I hope audiences respond to it in a way that compels us to keep going after the first year or two of work. It's fresh territory for me as a film-maker.'

Howard's screenwriter for the whole shebang is Akiva Goldsman, who won an Oscar for A Beautiful Mind but was also responsible for The Da Vinci Code and sequel Angels and Demons – two films the average cinemagoer would rather be burned as a heretic than sit through again. King is also on board as a producer, though it's not clear how much involvement he will have or want to have.

Both Howard and Goldsman seem to have been instrumental in getting the project greenlit by Universal, which is an excellent sign. My concern, however, is that both are what I would term 'safe pairs of hands' rather than visionary, risk-taking film-makers. King's Dark Tower series, which he describes as his 'magnum opus', is far from safe material. A nightmarish jigsaw puzzle of colliding references and motifs, it throws together a bloodthirsty panorama of Sergio Leone-esque cowboys, post-apocalyptic mutants, demons and murderers. Unlike Lord of the Rings, the violence is not filtered through comfortable olde-worlde stereotypes – no one is sipping ale at the Prancing Pony here – and there are regular reminders of how close the novels' fearsome universe is to the worst parts of our own.

It's a hellish vision, and one which bears little resemblance to anything else in either film-maker's canon. Moreover, even if the film versions are able to push the envelope a little, how will the TV series follow suit if they are screened as planned on conservative US TV network NBC?

With luck, we'll know sooner rather than later. Howard is planning to begin directing the first film as soon as he's finished The Dilemma, a comedy starring Vince Vaughn, Jennifer Connelly and Winona Ryder. Given MGM's current travails, this means the first Dark Tower film might even arrive on our screens before Jackson's The Hobbit. 'Cannot be done' doesn't seem to be in Howard's vocabulary – but is he the right man for the job?


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

"

HTC Desire HD first hands-on! -- Engadget

HTC Desire HD first hands-on! -- Engadget